<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which Mountain Bike Would You Go For?  Thanks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mountainbikepedals.org/which-mountain-bike-would-you-go-for-thanks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mountainbikepedals.org/which-mountain-bike-would-you-go-for-thanks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:31:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pmt853</title>
		<link>http://mountainbikepedals.org/which-mountain-bike-would-you-go-for-thanks/comment-page-1/#comment-704</link>
		<dc:creator>pmt853</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mountainbikepedals.org/which-mountain-bike-would-you-go-for-thanks/#comment-704</guid>
		<description>They all look pretty good. I&#039;d probably go for the Santa Cruz, it&#039;s the newest bike and even a well maintained bike will show its age if it gets a reasonable amount of use, especially if it&#039;s mostly off-road. Frame building technology has also improved over the years, better material, design, welding etc all add up. I also like all the XT kit and the Reba fork on the bike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They all look pretty good. I&#8217;d probably go for the Santa Cruz, it&#8217;s the newest bike and even a well maintained bike will show its age if it gets a reasonable amount of use, especially if it&#8217;s mostly off-road. Frame building technology has also improved over the years, better material, design, welding etc all add up. I also like all the XT kit and the Reba fork on the bike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M V</title>
		<link>http://mountainbikepedals.org/which-mountain-bike-would-you-go-for-thanks/comment-page-1/#comment-703</link>
		<dc:creator>M V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 10:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mountainbikepedals.org/which-mountain-bike-would-you-go-for-thanks/#comment-703</guid>
		<description>The first bike would get my vote; 2003 is getting to be old.  They all appear to be good bikes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first bike would get my vote; 2003 is getting to be old.  They all appear to be good bikes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://mountainbikepedals.org/which-mountain-bike-would-you-go-for-thanks/comment-page-1/#comment-702</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 05:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mountainbikepedals.org/which-mountain-bike-would-you-go-for-thanks/#comment-702</guid>
		<description>I would chose 1 as my first choice. I have never had a santa cruz, but it being newer is a big plus. they all sound like really nice bikes. I would probably chose 3 and my second choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would chose 1 as my first choice. I have never had a santa cruz, but it being newer is a big plus. they all sound like really nice bikes. I would probably chose 3 and my second choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

